Clean Nutraceuticals Lawsuit 2026: Prop 65 Lead Notice Against Allseason Enterprises and Amazon, Explained

Searches for the Clean Nutraceuticals lawsuit have increased in 2026 because many websites claim the company is facing a class action or has already paid millions in settlements. However, those claims are not supported by publicly available court records.

As of this publication, we found no publicly filed lawsuit, certified class action, judgment, or settlement involving Clean Nutraceuticals over the allegations discussed in this article. What does exist is a California Proposition 65 60-day notice served against Allseason Enterprises, LLC (doing business as Clean Nutraceuticals) and Amazon.com Services, LLC, alleging that one supplement product exposed California consumers to lead without the warning required under state law.

This guide explains what the Proposition 65 notice says, how it differs from an actual lawsuit, what consumers should know, and why some online reports appear to confuse unrelated legal matters with this notice.

Quick Answer

There is no filed Clean Nutraceuticals lawsuit as of this writing. What exists is a California Proposition 65 60-day notice of intent to sue, filed August 25, 2024, by Clean Product Advocates, LLC against Allseason Enterprises, LLC (doing business as Clean Nutraceuticals) and Amazon.com Services, LLC.

The notice alleges that Clean Nutraceuticals Ashwagandha Maca (UPC X00335T3NF) exposed California consumers to lead without the warning required under Proposition 65. No court case, settlement, or judgment has been filed or entered against Clean Nutraceuticals to date. Claims circulating online about a “$3.1 million Clean Nutraceuticals settlement” or a certified consumer class action against the brand are not supported by any public court record and appear to trace back to unrelated cases.

Clean Nutraceuticals Lawsuit at a Glance

What Actually Happened

On August 25, 2024, the Cliffwood Law Firm, PC submitted a California Proposition 65 60-day notice on behalf of Clean Product Advocates, LLC, a private organization authorized to enforce Proposition 65 through citizen actions. The notice is named:

• Allseason Enterprises, LLC, doing business as Clean Nutraceuticals, is the manufacturer or distributor.
• Amazon.com Services, LLC, as a distributor, because the product was allegedly sold through Amazon’s marketplace.

As required by California law, the notice was also served on the California Attorney General along with relevant district attorneys and city attorneys before any private enforcement action could proceed.

The Product and Allegation

The notice identifies Clean Nutraceuticals Ashwagandha Maca as the product at issue, and alleges it exposed consumers to lead — a chemical on California’s Proposition 65 list — through ingestion, without the “clear and reasonable” warning the law requires. The notice states this exposure has been occurring since at least July 16, 2024.

Under Proposition 65, lead is regulated because ingestion exposure is linked to cancer, birth defects, and other reproductive harm.

Proposition 65, formally known as the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986, requires businesses selling products in California to provide a “clear and reasonable” warning if consumers may be exposed to listed chemicals above established regulatory thresholds.

A Proposition 65 notice does not automatically mean a product is unsafe, defective, or subject to recall. Instead, it alleges that a required warning may have been missing. Companies may respond by disputing the allegations, adding warning labels, reformulating products, negotiating a settlement, or defending the matter in court if litigation follows.

Understanding this distinction is important because a Proposition 65 notice is different from a court finding that a product caused harm.

Timeline of the Clean Nutraceuticals Matter

Is This a Lawsuit? Not Yet — Here’s the Difference

A lot of confusion around this topic comes from conflating a Prop 65 notice with a filed lawsuit. They are not the same thing:

Under California Health & Safety Code § 25249.7(d), a private party like Clean Product Advocates must wait 60 days after serving notice before it can file a private enforcement lawsuit — and only if government prosecutors haven’t already stepped in. This waiting period exists specifically to give companies a chance to resolve the issue (through a recall, reformulation, or warning label) without litigation.

As of this writing, we found no docketed California state court case, no settlement agreement, and no judgment naming Clean Nutraceuticals, Allseason Enterprises, or this specific Prop 65 claim.

In other words, a Proposition 65 notice marks the beginning of a legal process, not the conclusion of one. Until a complaint is filed in court, there is no active lawsuit for a judge to decide. Many Proposition 65 notices are resolved without a trial through warning-label changes, product reformulation, negotiated settlements, or other compliance measures.

What Could Happen Next?

Following a Proposition 65 notice, several outcomes are possible:

• The company may voluntarily add Proposition 65 warning labels.
• The product may be reformulated to reduce exposure to the listed chemical.
• The parties may negotiate a settlement.
• A private enforcement lawsuit may be filed if no resolution is reached.
• California government authorities may decide to intervene instead of private litigants.

As of this publication, we found no publicly available court filing indicating which outcome, if any, will occur in this matter.

Correcting the Record: What This Case Is Not

Several low-quality websites have published contradictory and inaccurate claims about a “Clean Nutraceuticals lawsuit” that do not match the public record.

Much of the confusion appears to stem from websites combining unrelated lawsuits involving other dietary supplement companies with the Proposition 65 notice discussed here. Similar company names, automated content generation, and incomplete sourcing have likely contributed to inaccurate reporting across multiple websites. We’re flagging these directly because they’re actively misleading consumers searching for accurate information:

• False claim: “$3.1 million judgment against Clean Nutraceuticals.” This figure appears to come from an unrelated trademark dispute involving a different company, Nutradose Labs LLC, that has nothing to do with Clean Nutraceuticals or Allseason Enterprises.
• False claim: “Certified consumer class action over false labeling.” No class certification, complaint, or docket number tied to Clean Nutraceuticals has been published by any court-record source. Some sites appear to have generated this narrative to capture search traffic rather than to report a real filing. Consumers researching supplement-related legal claims may also want to read our coverage of the Cymbiotika lawsuit, which explains the difference between verified legal filings and online speculation involving another dietary supplement company.
• Separate, unrelated case: Nutrafol. Some search results also surface a real 2023 class action, Smith v. Nutraceutical Wellness, Inc., over Nutrafol hair-growth supplements. That case involves a different company (Nutraceutical Wellness, Inc., maker of Nutrafol) and different allegations (misbranding as an unapproved “new drug” under the FDCA). It is unrelated to Clean Nutraceuticals or Allseason Enterprises, despite similar-sounding names.

If you see a website citing a specific settlement dollar figure or class certification for Clean Nutraceuticals, ask for the docket number and court. As of publication, none has surfaced in public records.

Who May Be Affected?

The Proposition 65 notice specifically concerns Clean Nutraceuticals Ashwagandha Maca (UPC X00335T3NF) sold in California, where Proposition 65 warning requirements apply.

The notice does not automatically apply to:

• every Clean Nutraceuticals supplement;
• consumers who purchased unrelated products from the brand;
• customers outside California; or
• Individuals claiming unrelated health conditions.

Consumers who purchased the identified product may wish to keep their receipt, packaging, and lot information in case additional public developments occur.

Is There Also an NSF Certification Issue?

We identified online references suggesting that NSF International issued a public notice concerning an alleged misuse of GMP certification claims associated with Clean Nutraceuticals. However, because we were unable to independently verify all of the underlying details through primary source documentation, we are not concluding at this time. If verified public records become available, we will update this article accordingly.

What This Means If You Bought the Product

Because no lawsuit or settlement currently exists, there is no claims process, payout, or deadline to file anything related to this Prop 65 notice. 

If you purchased the identified product, consider the following practical steps:

• Keep your purchase receipt, Amazon order history, and any remaining product packaging.
• Record the lot number if it is still available.
• Do not assume the notice means the product caused harm. Proposition 65 focuses on warning requirements rather than proof of injury.
• If you have medical concerns, consult a qualified healthcare professional.
• Follow updates from official sources instead of relying solely on third-party blogs or social media posts.

If you’re researching legal issues involving dietary supplements more broadly, you may also find our coverage of the Sun Coast Sciences lawsuit helpful.

How We Verified This Information

To prepare this article, our editorial team reviewed publicly available legal and regulatory records, including:

• California Proposition 65 notices maintained by the(California Attorney General Prop 65 Notice #2024-03585;
• publicly accessible court records;
• federal court filings, where applicable; and
• official regulatory sources.

As of the publication date, we found no publicly filed lawsuit, settlement, or court judgment involving Clean Nutraceuticals arising from the Proposition 65 notice discussed above.

FAQs

Is there currently an active Clean Nutraceuticals lawsuit?

No. As of this writing, only a Proposition 65 60-day notice has been filed — not a lawsuit. No case has been docketed in court against Clean Nutraceuticals or Allseason Enterprises over this matter.

What product is involved?

Clean Nutraceuticals Ashwagandha Maca, UPC X00335T3NF, is sold through Amazon and other retailers in California.

What chemical is at issue?

Lead, a chemical regulated under California’s Proposition 65 for cancer and reproductive harm risk when ingested above the “no significant risk” threshold without a warning.

Who filed the notice?

Clean Product Advocates, LLC, represented by the Cliffwood Law Firm, PC of Los Angeles, filed the notice on August 25, 2024.

Is the $3.1 million settlement figure real?

Not in connection with Clean Nutraceuticals. That figure traces back to an unrelated trademark case involving a different company, Nutradose Labs LLC.

Is this the same as the Nutrafol lawsuit?

No. Nutrafol is made by a separate company, Nutraceutical Wellness, Inc., and is the subject of a different, unrelated 2023 misbranding class action.

Does Proposition 65 mean a supplement is unsafe?

Not necessarily. Proposition 65 requires warnings when exposure to certain listed chemicals may exceed regulatory thresholds. A notice does not by itself establish that a product is unsafe or that it caused injury.

Has Clean Nutraceuticals recalled this product?

As of this publication, we found no publicly announced recall related to the Proposition 65 notice discussed in this article.

Can consumers receive settlement money?

No. There is currently no publicly announced settlement or claims process related to this matter.

Will this become a class action?

It is impossible to predict. A Proposition 65 notice does not automatically become a class action, and no publicly filed class action has been identified at this time.

Has Amazon been sued over this notice?

Amazon.com Services, LLC was identified as a distributor in the Proposition 65 notice. However, we found no publicly filed court lawsuit arising from this notice as of the publication date.

Is Clean Nutraceuticals GMP-certified?

Clean Nutraceuticals has marketed some products as being manufactured in GMP-compliant facilities. However, there have also been public references questioning certain GMP certification claims. Consumers should verify any current certification directly with the certifying organization or the manufacturer rather than relying solely on product packaging or third-party websites.

Is Clean Nutraceuticals an American company?

Yes. Clean Nutraceuticals is a U.S. supplement brand operated by Allseason Enterprises, LLC, which is based in California. Its products are primarily sold online through retailers such as Amazon and the company’s own website.

Are Clean Nutraceuticals supplements third-party tested?

Clean Nutraceuticals states that some of its supplements undergo third-party testing for quality and purity. However, testing practices may vary by product. Consumers looking for independent verification should review the product label or request supporting documentation from the manufacturer.

What is Clean Nutra good for?

Clean Nutra offers dietary supplements formulated to support various wellness goals, including immune health, energy, stress management, cognitive function, joint health, and overall nutrition. The intended benefits depend on the specific ingredients in each product. Dietary supplements are not approved to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent disease.

This article is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. ClassAction24 will update this page if a lawsuit is filed, a settlement is reached, or new public filings become available. If you have information about a docketed case related to this matter, contact our editorial team.

Written by

Sadia Parveen

Sadia Parveen is a content writer at ClassAction24.com who creates informational articles on class action lawsuits, consumer protection matters, and legal developments. Her work focuses on researching public court records, official filings, and reputable news sources, then presenting it in a clear and neutral format for general readers. Her articles follow the ClassAction24.com editorial policy and are reviewed by an editor before publication. She does not provide legal advice or professional legal services.

EmailLinkedInFacebook